Dawn of the Living Dead
Sunday, August 12th, 2007
No-budget writer/director David Heavener’s DAWN OF THE LIVING DEAD is the kind of movie MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER 3000 would have had a heyday with. And from all evidence, I’m fairly sure it was intentional. This is – in more than ways one – a messy film, as if the zombie genre raped the Indian burial ground genre, and this was the bastard child.
Here, a woman (Amanda Bauman) still reeling from the death of her daughter moves to a California home near little more than the Mexico border with her husband (Joe Estevez, quickly morphing into Gary Busey’s dopplegänger), who also happens to be her sponsor for her post-tragedy addictions. She starts experiencing strange visions at all hours of the night that feel very real, but her hubby tells her these are side effects of all her crazy meds.
Yet she actually has good reason to be freaking out. Her humble abode once was a safe house for illegals, and a whole family was slaughtered there. And now they’re coming back alive to pay the new owners a visit! And, hey, they’ve even brought a zombie baby!
Heavener himself shows up midway as the guy in charge of keeping the local windmills running, because, he explains, “When you have no energy, you have no life.” He wisely scripts himself some nudity-laden slow-motion sex with the missus, and appears to playing his role for yuks, whereas everyone else (Bauman especially) seem to be fully invested in motivation and all that nonsense. You don’t motivation for a movie in which some white-trash woman starts stripping for no good reason for two Mexicans her husband has captured (”We left Mexico for this?” the subtitles read. “Look at those melons. Ripe.”), complete with cheesy ’80s-style music video effects.
The gore effects are actually pretty good for this sort of thing (look for blood as thick as Welch’s grape jelly to ooze out that aforementioned zombie tot’s empty eye socket), even if all other production values are sacrificed. Yet this thing is full of entertainment – not for general audiences, but the Friday-night-beers-with-the-guys crowd who can appreciate bad films for their sheer, utter B-ness. –Rod Lott
Although the story may be as stripped-down as the Spartans themselves,
In these sequences, one can see how panels from Miller’s work were lifted directly onto Synder’s viewfinder. The latter does an excellent job of using the former’s work as a template, but then building bridges between the individual scenes to fill in the action and make it come truly alive. Has there ever been a case where a film followed its source material so closely?